| |||||||||||||
"Best Buy" as defendant"Best Buy" as defendantPosted Aug 4, 2010 20:17 UTC (Wed) by markhb (guest, #1003)In reply to: LWN lists the plaintiff wrong. by bkuhn Parent article: BusyBox and the GPL Prevail Again (Groklaw)
Was Best Buy a defendant (I'm not sure if "defendant" or "respondent" is correct in this case) because of its own Insignia TV's, or because selling e.g. "Westinghouse" (or Sony or Panasonic) TV's with embedded Linux makes it effectively a distributor of GPL'd software and therefore subject to the requirement to make source available?
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||