If the aim is to get Wesnoth used by as many people and platforms as possible isn't the GPL the wrong license? Wouldn't it be a more accurate representation of the project's goals to attempt to relicense under a BSD-like license?
If the copyright-holding developers feel that the project should have that priority they would agree to such a change. If they don't agree because they're selfishly using Wesnoth as a vehicle to promote GPL software, then that's their call.
Wesnoth struggles with App Store's GPL incompatibilities
Posted Jul 22, 2010 8:03 UTC (Thu) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
Ah yes. Because everyone who'd prefer to use the GPL to BSD license is selfish. *That's* a fair characterization (not).
Wesnoth struggles with App Store's GPL incompatibilities
Posted Jul 22, 2010 8:09 UTC (Thu) by arctanx (subscriber, #59239)
[Link]
That was sarcasm based on the comments directed at Rusty on the list. Apologies if it wasn't clear. :)
(If I'm the one missing the sarcasm... well... darn)
Wesnoth struggles with App Store's GPL incompatibilities
Posted Jul 22, 2010 11:54 UTC (Thu) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
No, I didn't notice any sarcasm, probably because I didn't try to read the list thread...
Wesnoth struggles with App Store's GPL incompatibilities
Posted Jul 30, 2010 5:08 UTC (Fri) by SapientX (guest, #69307)
[Link]
I suppose I deserve that, but if you read my later posts you would see that I apologized for my initial judgmental and ignorant accusation. Just in case you were wondering...
-- Patrick Parker a.k.a. "Sapient"
Wesnoth struggles with App Store's GPL incompatibilities
Posted Jul 30, 2010 7:23 UTC (Fri) by rusty (✭ supporter ✭, #26)
[Link]
> I suppose I deserve that, but if you read my later posts you would see
Yep that quote was unfortunate, but it stood out I think because the discussion has been so civilized. That's a big reason why Wesnoth is so fun :)
And I'd rather get flamed by Sapient than complimented by a non-contributor any day!