LWN.net Logo

In Theory, Microkernels Are Good

In Theory, Microkernels Are Good

Posted Jul 2, 2010 16:31 UTC (Fri) by coriordan (guest, #7544)
In reply to: In Theory, Microkernels Are Good by rsidd
Parent article: GNU HURD: Altered visions and lost promise (The H)

Didn't they use a single-server architecture though?

Hurd's speciality is its multi-server architecture, so the Mac OSX example doesn't prove much. (If my first sentence is correct.)


(Log in to post comments)

In Theory, Microkernels Are Good

Posted Jul 2, 2010 17:22 UTC (Fri) by gnb (subscriber, #5132) [Link]

>Didn't they use a single-server architecture though?
I think so. And I'm pretty sure OSF/1, err... Digital Unix... Tru64... whatever did too. Basically using MACH to provide the low-level primitives in order to make getting a Unix kernel running, and subsequently porting it, easier.

Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds