| |||||||||||||
Very true but it begs the question of generic picture management policy.Very true but it begs the question of generic picture management policy.Posted Jun 29, 2010 16:41 UTC (Tue) by nix (subscriber, #2304)In reply to: Very true but it begs the question of generic picture management policy. by paulj Parent article: A quick grumpy review of Shotwell
Wouldn't we call these multiple-stream files 'directories'?
(Log in to post comments)
Very true but it begs the question of generic picture management policy. Posted Jun 29, 2010 17:45 UTC (Tue) by paulj (subscriber, #341) [Link]
Yep, but that's fragile in the face of applications that are not aware that the dirs+files are arranged in certain way - leading to the problems the parent poster perceives which caused them to argue for xattrs (which are much, much more fragile in the same sense - and hence much worse).
Very true but it begs the question of generic picture management policy. Posted Jun 29, 2010 20:03 UTC (Tue) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]
FUSE (automounted by a library) plus something like tarballs (only not actually .tar, I know .tar is vile, maybe .gz.cpio, i.e. gzipped first then cpioed?) might do the trick.
|
|||||||||||||