| |||||||||||||
Btrfs: broken file system design (was Unbound(?) internal fragmentation in Btrfs)Btrfs: broken file system design (was Unbound(?) internal fragmentation in Btrfs)Posted Jun 24, 2010 21:02 UTC (Thu) by vonbrand (subscriber, #4458)In reply to: Btrfs: broken file system design (was Unbound(?) internal fragmentation in Btrfs) by NRArnot Parent article: Btrfs: broken file system design (was Unbound(?) internal fragmentation in Btrfs)
I understand the above numbers aren't some "worst case behaviour", but (simple but near real-life) test cases.
(Log in to post comments)
Btrfs: broken file system design (was Unbound(?) internal fragmentation in Btrfs) Posted Jun 28, 2010 6:09 UTC (Mon) by cwillu (subscriber, #67268) [Link]
Honestly, I'm suspicious that Edward is just trolling. The actual test points he's brought up have been addressed, and are unrelated to the major claims he's making with regards to the actual design. Requests for clarification on those claims have yet to be answered beyond simple restatements of the claims.
|
|||||||||||||