Recent Features
| |||||||||||||
SELF: Anatomy of an (alleged) failureSELF: Anatomy of an (alleged) failurePosted Jun 24, 2010 16:39 UTC (Thu) by Spudd86 (guest, #51683)In reply to: SELF: Anatomy of an (alleged) failure by gnb Parent article: SELF: Anatomy of an (alleged) failure
FatELF isn't a new format, it's just ELF with special section set up for multi-arch stuff, the kernel needs to understand this so it can load them properly
(Log in to post comments)
SELF: Anatomy of an (alleged) failure Posted Jun 24, 2010 19:05 UTC (Thu) by gnb (subscriber, #5132) [Link]
That's the bit I don't understand. Why can't it just hand the thing off to a custom program loader, either by specifying one in the .interp section or, as others have said, by using binfmt support?
|
|||||||||||||