| |||||||||||||
Very true but it begs the question of generic picture management policy.Very true but it begs the question of generic picture management policy.Posted Jun 17, 2010 13:45 UTC (Thu) by dgm (subscriber, #49227)In reply to: Very true but it begs the question of generic picture management policy. by doogie Parent article: A quick grumpy review of Shotwell
Just my thoughts. Git is supposedly a dumb content tracker, so it looks like it's just asking for it.
And btw, I didn't knew of git-notes, thanks for the pointer!
(Log in to post comments)
Very true but it begs the question of generic picture management policy. Posted Jun 17, 2010 17:42 UTC (Thu) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313) [Link]
to make this work well in git you would need to make a diff function that would handle the EXIF metadata appropriately (so that if you change a EXIF tag git doesn't think the entire file is different)
this isn't a huge undertaking, but I'm not aware that anyone has done it yet.
Even after you do this you may have grief with large repositories.
|
|||||||||||||