| |||||||||||||
Obligations of noncommercial distributorsObligations of noncommercial distributorsPosted Jun 13, 2010 14:30 UTC (Sun) by Lefty (guest, #51528)In reply to: Obligations of noncommercial distributors by dark Parent article: FSF takes on Apple's App Store over GPL
"dark" is correct: there's nothing in the GPL to suggest that one gets a pass because binaries are "unaltered". Apple didn't alter the binaries it received from Robota Softwarehouse, either.
(Log in to post comments)
Obligations of noncommercial distributors Posted Jun 13, 2010 21:04 UTC (Sun) by jake (editor, #205) [Link]
> Apple didn't alter the binaries it received from Robota Softwarehouse,
> either.
Doesn't it encrypt and sign them? So that they are Apple-DRM compliant?
jake
|
|||||||||||||