| |||||||||||||
A look at GNOME ShellA look at GNOME ShellPosted Jun 11, 2010 12:16 UTC (Fri) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)In reply to: A look at GNOME Shell by k8to Parent article: A look at GNOME Shell
We have no scarcity of opinions. We do certainly have a problem of getting people to do the work involved unfortunately. If it doesn't work well, it will fail on its own terms. I rather reserve judgement till that point.
(Log in to post comments)
A look at GNOME Shell Posted Jun 11, 2010 14:12 UTC (Fri) by jond (subscriber, #37669) [Link]
The thing is, sticking with our current non-binary system requires no work.
A look at GNOME Shell Posted Jun 11, 2010 15:36 UTC (Fri) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]
No work involved for maintainers or users doesn't make a system ideal if the current characteristics are not right for the next major version of a desktop environment. GNOME has been thinking about a replacement for Gconf for quite sometime. With the opportunity now, they have. One could argue, the previous system was perfect but that isn't reality.
|
|||||||||||||