| |||||||||||||
FSF takes on Apple's App Store over GPLFSF takes on Apple's App Store over GPLPosted Jun 10, 2010 19:44 UTC (Thu) by MortenSickel (subscriber, #3238)In reply to: FSF takes on Apple's App Store over GPL by armijn Parent article: FSF takes on Apple's App Store over GPL
Which then is as simple as a break of the GPL. How you can say that installing software onto a device is not copying, or that denying to install a piece of software is not do deny copying?
(Log in to post comments)
FSF takes on Apple's App Store over GPL Posted Jun 10, 2010 20:07 UTC (Thu) by sfeam (subscriber, #2841) [Link]
The terms as quoted up-thread use the word "obtain". The customer is limited to "obtaining" five instances of the program. Do you want to argue that "obtain" really means "copy" rather than "download"?
FSF takes on Apple's App Store over GPL Posted Jun 10, 2010 20:17 UTC (Thu) by martinfick (subscriber, #4455) [Link]
Could you be more specific, which thread? I cannot find the word "obtain" in any other post at the time of this post) than yours.
FSF takes on Apple's App Store over GPL Posted Jun 10, 2010 20:37 UTC (Thu) by armijn (subscriber, #3653) [Link]
How can not wanting to distribute to someone breach a distribution license?
|
|||||||||||||