| |||||||||||||
The answers are there, you just don't want to admit they are right answers...The answers are there, you just don't want to admit they are right answers...Posted May 31, 2010 16:33 UTC (Mon) by mezcalero (subscriber, #45103)In reply to: The answers are there, you just don't want to admit they are right answers... by khim Parent article: The road forward for systemd
Well, this problem does not exist. The socket is created before bind is started, so a bind client will never notice that bind is in fact not yet started, or might still be in the process of starting up: because it can connect the socket just fine.
So, the whole idea of "application bombs out if bind is not yet started" is bogus. Doesn't exist in the systemd scheme.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||