It's all fixable...
Posted May 27, 2010 12:03 UTC (Thu) by
hppnq (subscriber, #14462)
In reply to:
It's all fixable... by khim
Parent article:
The road forward for systemd
But is it correct and good approach? Obviously not - duplication of information is almost always bad because copies grow apart over time. Sometimes it's needed for performance reason, but I'm not seeing such need with regard to systemd...
But systemd should be able to handle things like socket options, network addresses, file permissions/ownership, and a few more. I don't see how this can be easily done without duplication of information.
(And how about processes that decide on, say, port numbers or domain socket names only after they have been started?)
(
Log in to post comments)