| |||||||||||||
This is a badly researched article.This is a badly researched article.Posted May 27, 2010 10:12 UTC (Thu) by farnz (guest, #17727)In reply to: This is a badly researched article. by nye Parent article: Swift and predictable reactions to WebM
Cut the rhetoric, please. I didn't see anyone asking for a full solution on a silver platter, except you in this comment. And I'm afraid that I agree with roc; he doesn't point to patents which are infringed, and say "I think you infringe this patent". Instead, he says, "well, this is very similar to H.264 (which we know is patent encumbered), but slightly different. Ergo, the patents we know about might affect it, so you can't claim you don't need a patent licence to use it without being on dodgy legal ground". It's no different from me saying "well, we know Microsoft have software patents on Windows and Office, and Linux with GNOME and OpenOffice.org is awfully similar to Windows and Office. Ergo, the patents we know about might affect it, so you can't claim you don't need a patent licence to use it without being on dodgy legal ground."
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||