Recent Features
| |||||||||||||
The road forward for systemdThe road forward for systemdPosted May 27, 2010 4:27 UTC (Thu) by elanthis (guest, #6227)In reply to: The road forward for systemd by clugstj Parent article: The road forward for systemd
Inetd does not do what systemd does. Apparently you got as far as "starts daemons when things connect to the proper port" and stopped reading there, and in turn are just talking out your ass without understanding what you're talking about. Read the freaking article and quit wasting your time and our time.
(Log in to post comments)
The road forward for systemd Posted May 27, 2010 14:35 UTC (Thu) by sharms (subscriber, #57357) [Link]
You rebutt his comment without explaining why it is wrong. That does not make sense.
The road forward for systemd Posted Jul 7, 2010 10:15 UTC (Wed) by geocar (guest, #68511) [Link]
The comment is rebutted in the article. systemd and inetd are as meaningfully similar as postfix and stunnel, and maybe less so.
|
|||||||||||||