Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script
[Posted May 26, 2010 by jake]
| From: |
| Neil Williams <codehelp-AT-debian.org> |
| To: |
| debian-devel-AT-lists.debian.org |
| Subject: |
| Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script |
| Date: |
| Tue, 25 May 2010 23:10:10 +0100 |
| Archive-link: |
| Article, Thread
|
On Tue, 25 May 2010 16:13:36 -0500
Raphael Geissert <geissert@debian.org> wrote:
A much more sane list is in the bug report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=45;filen...
124 source packages. Bad, but not as crazy as 1,540.
(I've heard of off-by-one errors but off-by-one-order-of-magnitude is a
stretch.)
Please, let's get some accurate figures before raising things like
this. (Oh, and yes, putting a patched dash into unstable and putting
this broken one into experimental is a VERY good idea IMHO. It's kinda
why we have experimental in the first place..... Sheesh! This thing
gonna give me nightmares.)
--
Neil Williams
=============
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
(
Log in to post comments)