| |||||||||||||
This is a badly researched article.This is a badly researched article.Posted May 26, 2010 13:57 UTC (Wed) by foom (subscriber, #14868)In reply to: This is a badly researched article. by KotH Parent article: Swift and predictable reactions to WebM
I also think that google should be a lot more open on whos work they are building on. For example, the container of webm is matroska, just relabled as webm. But with no word are they thanked for the great work they have done to create this container. They are simple forgotten in all the hype creation machinery. Perhaps you'd like them to say something like this on their "about" page?
(Log in to post comments)
This is a badly researched article. Posted May 26, 2010 17:36 UTC (Wed) by Sho (subscriber, #8956) [Link]
While I agree with you, it's worth mentioning that Google worked together with the Matroska folks on WebM, and that the Matroska website has posted a notice of full support, as have individual Matroska developers in their blogs.
This is a badly researched article. Posted May 26, 2010 18:15 UTC (Wed) by ballombe (subscriber, #9523) [Link] Yes, I would like to see that. All I can see now isis WebM?an open, royalty-free, media file format designed for the web. fines the file container structure, video and audio formats. WebM files video streams compressed with the VP8 video codec and audio streams ed with the Vorbis audio codec. The WebM file structure is based on the a container.No mention of Matroska.
This is a badly researched article. Posted May 26, 2010 18:37 UTC (Wed) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]
Must be some problem with your browser or something. It clearly does mention Matroska and links to it even.
This is a badly researched article. Posted May 27, 2010 8:54 UTC (Thu) by mpr22 (subscriber, #60784) [Link]
There is clearly a broken interaction between their stylesheet and your browser.
|
|||||||||||||