| |||||||||||||
Swift and predictable reactions to WebMSwift and predictable reactions to WebMPosted May 26, 2010 12:29 UTC (Wed) by sorpigal (subscriber, #36106)Parent article: Swift and predictable reactions to WebM
What I was looking for and did not see in all of this is something from Google stating that they are submitting VP8 or VP8+Matroska+Vorbis to a standards body. It's nice if it's patent free and open source but it isn't a standard until it's a standard... and I would prefer the independent review that the process would likely entail.
(Log in to post comments)
Swift and predictable reactions to WebM Posted May 26, 2010 13:05 UTC (Wed) by zonker (subscriber, #7867) [Link]
And which standards body should be reviewing this?
Swift and predictable reactions to WebM Posted May 26, 2010 14:28 UTC (Wed) by paulj (subscriber, #341) [Link]
Whichever one Google prefers working with? ISO and IETF are the main technology ones. IETF requires disclosure of patents from participants, which may be a benefit (presuming ISO does not have such rules).
|
|||||||||||||