| |||||||||||||
can perl6 keep up with perl5??can perl6 keep up with perl5??Posted Apr 14, 2010 4:56 UTC (Wed) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)In reply to: can perl6 keep up with perl5?? by b7j0c Parent article: Perl 5.12.0 released
Take a look at ftrace and systemtap.
(Log in to post comments)
can perl6 keep up with perl5?? Posted Apr 14, 2010 16:52 UTC (Wed) by b7j0c (subscriber, #27559) [Link]
neither of those tools are in the same league as dtrace
can perl6 keep up with perl5?? Posted Apr 14, 2010 23:49 UTC (Wed) by clump (subscriber, #27801) [Link]
Possibly, but Solaris's time has passed.
can perl6 keep up with perl5?? Posted Apr 15, 2010 5:08 UTC (Thu) by b7j0c (subscriber, #27559) [Link]
freebsd's hasn't
what is the only OS in the world you can use all of zsh, dtrace, grand central dispatch? freebsd
linux competing tech is either lame (systemtap) or alpha quality (btrfs)
can perl6 keep up with perl5?? Posted Apr 15, 2010 5:09 UTC (Thu) by b7j0c (subscriber, #27559) [Link]
s/zsh/zfs/
can perl6 keep up with perl5?? Posted Apr 15, 2010 5:42 UTC (Thu) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]
Have you even tried ftrace? Btrfs on-disk format has stabilized and is available as a option in most distributions and will become default in the next 6 months to an year. Fedora 13 for example will feature
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemRollbackWith...
can perl6 keep up with perl5?? Posted Apr 16, 2010 20:23 UTC (Fri) by clump (subscriber, #27801) [Link]
I wouldn't necessarily use FreeBSD as a success story, with strongholds like Yahoo beginning to deploy more Linux.
can perl6 keep up with perl5?? Posted Apr 15, 2010 9:52 UTC (Thu) by danpb (subscriber, #4831) [Link]
For userspace probing SystemTap is actually compatible with the DTrace probe markers format. Fedora 13 wires up the DTrace markers in Java, Python & PostgreSQL with SystemTap. The same could be done with this new support in Perl
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemtapStaticPr...
|
|||||||||||||