| |||||||||||||
A proposed Subversion vision and roadmapA proposed Subversion vision and roadmapPosted Apr 5, 2010 14:10 UTC (Mon) by fw (subscriber, #26023)In reply to: A proposed Subversion vision and roadmap by jengelh Parent article: A proposed Subversion vision and roadmap
Those fix-up commits aren't pretty. But I've seen Git histories which contain merges of both the rebased and non-rebased versions of development history. This is far worse. When such things happen, it can become very difficult to extract any relevant information from the DAG, severely limiting its usefulness.
(Log in to post comments)
A proposed Subversion vision and roadmap Posted Apr 6, 2010 23:04 UTC (Tue) by vonbrand (subscriber, #4458) [Link] You shouldn't publish rebased branches (or any branches with rewritten history that was seen before). In true Unix tradition, git provides plenty of rope to shoot your feet with...
A proposed Subversion vision and roadmap Posted Apr 6, 2010 23:14 UTC (Tue) by jengelh (subscriber, #33263) [Link]
And SVN provides the gun to hang yourself with? :-)
A proposed Subversion vision and roadmap Posted Apr 7, 2010 17:19 UTC (Wed) by cry_regarder (subscriber, #50545) [Link]
One bright day in the middle of the night
two dead boys got up to fight back to back they faced each other drew their swords and shot each other
|
|||||||||||||