| |||||||||||||
Subversion considered obsoleteSubversion considered obsoletePosted Apr 4, 2010 0:55 UTC (Sun) by jengelh (subscriber, #33263)In reply to: Subversion considered obsolete by wahern Parent article: A proposed Subversion vision and roadmap
>I once let a git-svn clone run--over a LAN--for 2 days straight before giving up. Not just Git's fault,
I don't see git at fault, but how SVN is organized/utilized is the bottleneck. If you had to make one HTTP request for every changed file in every revision (the repo reaching approximately 2 million objects this year), you may not be done downloading linux-2.6.git in two days either. You can easily test that.. unpack the packs into separate objects, create the http metadata and let it clone. Then again, you could probably pull it off, given git does not have to calculate any diffs.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||