A proposed Subversion vision and roadmap
Posted Apr 4, 2010 0:09 UTC (Sun) by dskoll
In reply to: A proposed Subversion vision and roadmap
Parent article: A proposed Subversion vision and roadmap
Sometimes it may not even be a technical problem at all; it may just be their taste or it's just that they simply don't need anything more than what they already have.
Absolutely 100% agreed. And if the SVN developers came out and said "Subversion is for those people who like Subversion, or for whom it's adequate, or who don't want to learn another system", great! But spreading FUD by saying you need this, that or the other feature that only SVN has is simply.. FUD.
SVN definitely has its place. While my workplace has switched to git for source-code control, we still use SVN to manage document revisions for non-technical personnel. We found they took a while to wrap their heads around "update" and "commit", and certainly didn't think they'd easily grasp "commit" vs "push", and "fetch"/"pull"/"merge".
to post comments)