| |||||||||||||
A proposed Subversion vision and roadmapA proposed Subversion vision and roadmapPosted Apr 3, 2010 16:21 UTC (Sat) by dmitrij.ledkov (subscriber, #63320)In reply to: A proposed Subversion vision and roadmap by stumbles Parent article: A proposed Subversion vision and roadmap
Hmmm let's see bzr supports central control and FS ACL's it supports svn checkouts where your
commit cannot rewrite history on the server and cannot divert mainline history. It supports central repository as well.
So if you want or need "coorporate theatre" and still have no pain DVCS merging choose bzr.
I'm very confused which 2 DVCS were picked? I guess git but I can't place the other one bzr, hg,
(Log in to post comments)
A proposed Subversion vision and roadmap Posted Apr 3, 2010 16:32 UTC (Sat) by bboissin (subscriber, #29506) [Link]
"I'm very confused which 2 DVCS were picked? I guess git but I can't place
the other one bzr, hg, darcs, monotone?" hg
A proposed Subversion vision and roadmap Posted Apr 3, 2010 16:38 UTC (Sat) by cowsandmilk (guest, #55475) [Link]
from my own experience, I would guess hg, but bzr has some pretty big deployments (launchpad...)
A proposed Subversion vision and roadmap Posted Apr 5, 2010 15:22 UTC (Mon) by bronson (subscriber, #4806) [Link]
The Launchpad source tree is 150MB, full history is 280MB. That's tiny!!
Judging by the icons on http://bazaar.canonical.com/en/ it looks like MySQL and GNU Emacs are the biggest bzr projects, but they're miniscule by KDE/Gnome/Moz/etc standards.
Does bzr have a win that's not shown in those icons?
A proposed Subversion vision and roadmap Posted Apr 5, 2010 16:20 UTC (Mon) by csenger (guest, #65002) [Link]
>> from my own experience, I would guess hg, but bzr has some
>> pretty big deployments (launchpad...)
> The Launchpad source tree is 150MB, full history is 280MB.
Launchpad with bzr as a deployment is more interesting than the size of the source code of launchpad itself. It runs (taken from their frontpage) more than 17.000 projects, so there are many bzr users.
> Judging by the icons on http://bazaar.canonical.com/en/ it
I guess the biggest project is Ubuntu, but I'm sure they do not use one shared repository.
> Does bzr have a win that's not shown in those icons?
They are nice guys who behave friendly.
..Carsten
A proposed Subversion vision and roadmap Posted Apr 6, 2010 20:12 UTC (Tue) by vonbrand (subscriber, #4458) [Link]
How many projects are the on repo.or.cz, gitorius, github, codaset, under git at Sourceforge and similar sites? Just github claims some 150,000 public repositories! This surely dwarfs any
A proposed Subversion vision and roadmap Posted Apr 8, 2010 8:28 UTC (Thu) by csenger (guest, #65002) [Link]
> How many projects are the on repo.or.cz, gitorius,
> github, codaset, under git at Sourceforge and > similar sites? Just github claims some 150,000 public repositories!
That wasn't the question, and I'm not talking about X having the most users or Y having the hugest deployment. The root of this discussion was the question what may be the second mentioned dvcs. I'm sure it's mercurial, but it's important to see that bzr nonetheless has a big userbase.
> This surely dwarfs any bzr stuff on Launchpad...
Funny to see that always someone needs to state that he has the biggest.
A proposed Subversion vision and roadmap Posted Apr 6, 2010 19:18 UTC (Tue) by vonbrand (subscriber, #4458) [Link] If you have the right access to the repo, you can falsify history. Hell, you can create any history you want. A centralized system is more dangerous, as it is a single point of failure here. With a bit of massage to git (see the ProGit book, and in particular gitolite) you can restrict who can rewrite what history, so this is long not an issue anymore.
|
|||||||||||||