LWN.net Logo

Nautilus considered a nuisance.

Nautilus considered a nuisance.

Posted Apr 2, 2010 0:44 UTC (Fri) by ncm (subscriber, #165)
In reply to: Nautilus considered a nuisance. by ovitters
Parent article: GNOME 2.30 has been released

FWIW, I help out GNOME (can push your patch).

Thank you. You may start by backing out the patch that wiped out the in-place gconf documentation for apps/desktop/interface/gtk_key_theme, which used to identify "Emacs" as one of the key theme options, with the meaningless filler "Basename of the default theme used by gtk+". See http://lwn.net/Articles/361486/ . Once this is done (and logged in #558198) we can begin to discuss other fixes.

Though likely just the method to disable Nautilus taking over your desktop changed (it isn't really something which is a standard configuration for GNOME devs, so breakage is more likely to happen).

As noted in the posting linked at the top, this dependency was deliberately added by somebody who apparently thought everyone should be forced to run Nautilus. Presumably many people find Nautilus useful, and don't mind running it. While Emacs is likewise useful to many people, it isn't forced on everyone.


(Log in to post comments)

Nautilus considered a nuisance.

Posted Apr 2, 2010 11:46 UTC (Fri) by Darkmere (subscriber, #53695) [Link]

I believe in the Nautilus case that it was decided upon that "Icons on the desktop" is a major feature for many people. And since Nautilus is the application that does this, it was embedded to default.

The idea to merge the device management into Nautilus was an interesting choice, but when Nautilus was the primary gio/g-vfs management tool, I guess it made sense from an ease of implementation point of view.

Note that this was also set to change again for 3.0, where it was decided that the desktop was no longer to be used much as such with gnome-shell, so it's likely that the device management be branched out into it's own daemon(again?).

But frankly, I see no good reason to make a shitstorm that you find "icons on the desktop" to be such a misfeature that you have to, gasp. Configure it to off.
(Don't forget to toggle off the "exit with last window" check too, for device management when you don't use Nautilus in desktop mode)

Also, if you look at the session settings, you can disable the panel completely via another one of those oh so horrid gconf settings. I'm sure you'll be pleased to hear. And since window decorations are such a nuisance for a purist lightist like yourself, why not disable the windowmanager as well while you're at it.

Frankly, in a metriocratic development, like any desktop system that actually aims for mass appeal, deciding that you do not want an integrated part of the "Desktop" metaphor is an outlier.

Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds