| |||||||||||||
KVM, QEMU, and kernel project managementKVM, QEMU, and kernel project managementPosted Mar 25, 2010 15:01 UTC (Thu) by alankila (subscriber, #47141)In reply to: KVM, QEMU, and kernel project management by deater Parent article: KVM, QEMU, and kernel project management
Well, as far as x86/x64 virtualization is concerned, QEMU in software mode
doesn't seem very compatible and is also very slow. So I'd say it's far more useful with KVM than without.
(Log in to post comments)
KVM, QEMU, and kernel project management Posted Mar 26, 2010 22:01 UTC (Fri) by deater (subscriber, #11746) [Link]
Just because you have no use for a fast, cross-architecture dynamic binary translator that supports both user and full-system emulation, doesn't mean that the project is somehow dying or not useful. It's very disheartening as a Qemu developer seeing the project being dismissed as "dying" just because the latest buzzword is more in vogue. I currently have no use for KVM at all, yet I don't go around trashing it in public.
|
|||||||||||||