| |||||||||||||
Can we admit that sysfs was a really bad idea?Can we admit that sysfs was a really bad idea?Posted Mar 22, 2010 22:02 UTC (Mon) by neilbrown (subscriber, #359)In reply to: Can we admit that sysfs was a really bad idea? by dgm Parent article: A critical look at sysfs attribute values
The wikipedia article is wrong in several respects. "sysctl" and "sysfs" are independent concepts that attempt to address somewhat similar goals. sysctl is a "mangement information base" to which access is provided through the /proc filesystem. It may be that some values accessible through sysctl (i.e. /proc/sys) are also accessible through /sys, but that is certainly not the norm.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||