| |||||||||||||
Can we admit that sysfs was a really bad idea?Can we admit that sysfs was a really bad idea?Posted Mar 22, 2010 21:54 UTC (Mon) by neilbrown (subscriber, #359)In reply to: Can we admit that sysfs was a really bad idea? by quotemstr Parent article: A critical look at sysfs attribute values
I think that it is a very big step to go from "it has some problems" to "it is a bad idea". To my mind sysfs has a lot of strengths.
And sysctl really isn't measurably better. check out dev/cdrom/info (in /proc/sys). If sysctl has fewer problems it is only because it has substantially less content.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||