| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Spam blocking with greylistingSpam blocking with greylistingPosted Jun 26, 2003 10:27 UTC (Thu) by sjlyall (subscriber, #4151)Parent article: Spam blocking with greylisting One problem with this approach is that in this day and age people expect their email to go through in just a few seconds. I'll often be on the phone and I'll email someone a document and then we'll discuss it a few seconds later, many other people are used to doing similar. I run a mail system for a medium sized ISP and if there is a problem causing mail delays people quickly notice and either complain or become frustrated. I think that a system where a large percentage of email is delayed for up to an hour will be unacceptable for many people.
(Log in to post comments)
Spam blocking with greylisting Posted Jun 27, 2003 18:34 UTC (Fri) by ksmathers (guest, #2353) [Link] IM works better for that kind of collaboration. E-mail can be delayed for a whole variety of reasons.
Spam blocking with greylisting Posted Jun 28, 2003 2:07 UTC (Sat) by macfisherman (guest, #6018) [Link] Email is a store and forward technology, not an instant message system.
Spam blocking with greylisting Posted Jul 3, 2003 20:56 UTC (Thu) by khim (guest, #9252) [Link] It does not matter. Peoples are using it as IM technology and they will not stop doing so if you'll say it's not - they will just switch ISP...
|
|
||||||||||||