Posted Mar 17, 2010 19:39 UTC (Wed) by bronson (subscriber, #4806)
In reply to: Parrot 2.2?? by b7j0c
Parent article: Parrot 2.2.0 released
I'm not trolling, just offering an answer OP's question. I think it's unarguable that a team that has published two books without even having a working language has lost sight of the big picture.
Also, given the output of the project so far, I think one could be forgiven for thinking that the Perl6 team's top priorities until now has been producing progress reports and selling books.
Posted Mar 17, 2010 22:02 UTC (Wed) by chromatic (guest, #26207)
[Link]
The output of the project so far includes (as of tomorrow) 27 releases of Rakudo (Perl 6 on Parrot). There may be plenty to criticize, but "not releasing software" is not one of them. A better line of criticism is "Why is it necessary to reinvent regular expressions and spend a couple of years researching how to produce lexically scoped mutable grammars?" -- but once you understand why that's an interesting question, you'll probably have noticed the 27 releases of Rakudo.
I've had working software in Perl 6 for four and a half years.
Parrot 2.2??
Posted Mar 17, 2010 22:24 UTC (Wed) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)
[Link]
I don't understand the criticism of Perl 6 as not a "working language". It
has been included in Fedora 12
They do very frequent releases on a regular schedule and it is already used
by folks albeit in a limited fashion but that is not different from say,
Python 3. So it would be prudent to understand the current status before
being critical.
Parrot 2.2??
Posted Mar 18, 2010 9:53 UTC (Thu) by tzafrir (subscriber, #11501)
[Link]
And what can I do with it?
Specifically, in Debian I now see parrot already included in Squeeze, Rakudo is still in Experimental, but 0 other packages depend on parrot.
Parrot 2.2??
Posted Mar 18, 2010 10:09 UTC (Thu) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)
[Link]
You can write a Perl 6 program with it obviously :-) The formal release is
next month.