Re: [PATCH] perf: export perf_trace_regs and perf_arch_fetch_caller

From:		Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec-AT-gmail.com>
To:		Christoph Hellwig <hch-AT-infradead.org>
Subject:		Re: [PATCH] perf: export perf_trace_regs and perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs
Date:		Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:18:44 +0100
Cc:		Peter Zijlstra <peterz-AT-infradead.org>, Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong-AT-cn.fujitsu.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo-AT-elte.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus-AT-samba.org>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme-AT-infradead.org>, LKML <linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org>
Archive-link:		Article, Thread

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 04:14:44AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:10:51AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Pretty much all modular tracepoint users I think, I just got this from a
> > pp64_defconfig build:
> 
> Interesting, that doesn't happen in mainline yet.
> 

Yeah, it's in -tip.

Thanks guys for this fix. I think I'm unable to remind
there are modules in the kernel, I'm not counting anymore
the number of times I forget to export symbols for modules.

May be I should start to stick posters with photos of modules
entitled "I want to believe" everywhere in my flat.
Or perhaps I'm going to buy electronic glasses that display
modules advertizing in the street. I'm not sure yet but I'll
find a way.

(Log in to post comments)

Re: [PATCH] perf: export perf_trace_regs and perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs