Posted Mar 14, 2010 16:01 UTC (Sun) by danieldk (guest, #27876)
In reply to: Who is Fedora for? by rahulsundaram
Parent article: Who is Fedora for?
This is in sharp contrast, because CentOS usually only pushes minor
upgrades to -extras, and as you mention, only a small amount of packages
that are properly tested.
Fedora pushes quite major changes continuously, and a large amount of
them. You cannot expect testers to keep up with the amount and impact of
changes. The result is that packages will be pushed to the stable
distribution with to little testing compared to their impact, making Fedora
practically a beta distribution.
The solution is, of course, to only allow for very minor changes in a stable
version (security and reliability fixes). But Red Hat would never allow such a
policy, since it would be at odds with Red Hat's goals for Fedora. Hence,
my comment that things will only change if Fedora becomes more
independent.
It's funny because Fedora Governance decided that it would appropriate
measure and did it despite your strong claims to the contrary. Even more
funnier is that fact that the decision is also being attributed to Red Hat.
Who is Fedora for?
Posted Mar 14, 2010 16:51 UTC (Sun) by danieldk (guest, #27876)
[Link]
Great, let's see in three to five years. It's not the first time this discussion
came up, and solutions were proposed:
Posted Mar 14, 2010 16:53 UTC (Sun) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)
[Link]
So what? This is hardly the first time, a community has discussed something
on multiple occasions. There were some changes made then and there are some
changes made now. The decision you said would never happened already did.
Now would be a good time to take a step back and stop the naysaying.