| |||||||||||||
SCALE 8x: Relational vs. non-relationalSCALE 8x: Relational vs. non-relationalPosted Mar 5, 2010 19:34 UTC (Fri) by jake (editor, #205)In reply to: SCALE 8x: Relational vs. non-relational by einstein Parent article: SCALE 8x: Relational vs. non-relational
> he came off sounding like some unstable and embittered crank, resentful
> of the success of the competition and consumed with putting them down > at every opportunity.
Wow, I am going to have to disagree. While Josh was a tiny bit PostgreSQL partisan in his talk, he was most certainly not unstable or embittered. If my report makes him seem that way, then I reported poorly, for which you (and he) have my apologies.
jake
(Log in to post comments)
SCALE 8x: Relational vs. non-relational Posted Mar 7, 2010 23:01 UTC (Sun) by tack (subscriber, #12542) [Link]
Your reporting is fine (excellent, in fact). The GP and I have clearly read a different article.
Your wording most certainly did not "lump together MySQL and MS Access." The only legitimate complaint concerning MySQL (InnoDB supports transactions) has been pointed out and defended (MySQL+MyISAM is the default, and therefore "the most popular database").
|
|||||||||||||