| |||||||||||||
2.6.32.9 Release notes2.6.32.9 Release notesPosted Feb 22, 2010 20:22 UTC (Mon) by bojan (subscriber, #14302)In reply to: 2.6.32.9 Release notes by clugstj Parent article: 2.6.32.9 Release notes
> It's not a straw man. I'm too lazy to look it up, but nearly every time that there is a security problem in a kernel update, someone belly aches that the kernel developers should figure out for if this bug is a security problem for them.
I certainly never asked for anything like that.
So, once again: if it is known, it should be passed on. That's it.
(Log in to post comments)
2.6.32.9 Release notes Posted Feb 22, 2010 20:25 UTC (Mon) by clugstj (subscriber, #4020) [Link]
Guys, get over yourselves. When did I mention anyone by name?
2.6.32.9 Release notes Posted Feb 22, 2010 20:33 UTC (Mon) by bojan (subscriber, #14302) [Link]
Just making sure that "someone" doesn't include me.
2.6.32.9 Release notes Posted Feb 22, 2010 21:41 UTC (Mon) by PaXTeam (subscriber, #24616) [Link]
if you weren't just trolling then you can name at least one of those 'whiners'. with actual proof of that whining to back it up of course. should be easy since "nearly every time that there is a security problem in a kernel update, someone belly aches that the kernel developers should figure out for if this bug is a security problem for them".
|
|||||||||||||