Recent Features
| |||||||||||||
HTML5 video element codec debate reignitedHTML5 video element codec debate reignitedPosted Feb 13, 2010 1:29 UTC (Sat) by robert_s (subscriber, #42402)In reply to: HTML5 video element codec debate reignited by DonDiego Parent article: HTML5 video element codec debate reignited
"A lot of things are patented in all kinds of countries. The question is whether or not these patents can actually be enforced."
When a legal situation becomes this close, it actually boils down to this: if the MPEG-LA decide to drag this backwards and forwards through court, who do you think will run out of money first, MPEG-LA and its industry backers or you / mozilla.org / EFF / etc.?
It won't be the MPEG-LA.
(Log in to post comments)
HTML5 video element codec debate reignited Posted Feb 13, 2010 12:29 UTC (Sat) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]
It's a very sad commentary on the US legal system that it's turned into a
game of 'who will run out of money first' so damn often. Nobody even *mentions* justice anymore.
|
|||||||||||||