| |||||||||||||
Stable kernel 2.6.32.8Stable kernel 2.6.32.8Posted Feb 9, 2010 21:30 UTC (Tue) by chad.netzer (✭ supporter ✭, #4257)In reply to: Stable kernel 2.6.32.8 by PaXTeam Parent article: Stable kernel 2.6.32.8
Ok, how about *each* bugfix is a security fix. In a couple minutes of perusing I saw a kfree fix, a possible integer overflow fix, some NULL pointer dereferences, memset arg ordering fixes. All helpfully noted in the commit messages, by the way. So where would you like it all backported to? Would you care to help out?
1e8896049716fd580718bb9431c2ad3bddd114d7
You just let us know where you want 'em, and whatever other whim of yours we can possibly satisfy.
(Log in to post comments)
Stable kernel 2.6.32.8 Posted Feb 9, 2010 23:53 UTC (Tue) by PaXTeam (subscriber, #24616) [Link]
> Ok, how about *each* bugfix is a security fix.
i'm afraid you failed right here.
Stable kernel 2.6.32.8 Posted Feb 10, 2010 0:01 UTC (Wed) by chad.netzer (✭ supporter ✭, #4257) [Link]
In my best Jack Palance voice: "Prove it."
Stable kernel 2.6.32.8 Posted Feb 10, 2010 0:06 UTC (Wed) by PaXTeam (subscriber, #24616) [Link]
9c66557324ea4879abe8c9dde769a0061c81e1ac
Stable kernel 2.6.32.8 Posted Feb 10, 2010 1:18 UTC (Wed) by chad.netzer (✭ supporter ✭, #4257) [Link]
That's a "bugfix", is it? Wow, convincing...
So, that's one (possible) non-security commit. Any more? Keep this up and you may just answer what you set out to ask.
|
|||||||||||||