> There's no way to tell. Five years ago you could have said the same thing about the RIAA suing individual file-sharers, but then they started doing it.
The RIAA is not a patent pool, this is a straw man.
> Plus, let me remind you that your guess about the intention of the MPEG-LA to "not require" licenses for free software proved to be completely wrong. Betting on such guesses, no matter who makes them, would be foolish.
I never said any such thing. The MPEG LA patent license question rests on the depth of your pockets, not on the type of software you use.