| |||||||||||||
(L)GPL vs. patents(L)GPL vs. patentsPosted Feb 4, 2010 16:00 UTC (Thu) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)In reply to: (L)GPL vs. patents by DonDiego Parent article: Blizzard: HTML5 video and H.264 - what history tells us and why we're standing with the web
If you want your claims to be taken seriously it needs to be in writing If
you are repeatedly going to refer to claims about SFLC's interpretation it would be beneficial to get it in writing as well
(Log in to post comments)
(L)GPL vs. patents Posted Feb 4, 2010 16:07 UTC (Thu) by DonDiego (subscriber, #24141) [Link]
I am an FFmpeg copyright holder, so you already have a statement from me. We shall try to make something more official and put it on our website.
I would like you to provide me with the contrary interpretation in writing as well. You claim that the FSF has made statements to a different effect, but I never saw such a thing.
(L)GPL vs. patents Posted Feb 4, 2010 16:27 UTC (Thu) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]
Collectively a group making a statement is quite different from a single
copyright holder and I made no claims about FSF's interpretations You are confusing me with someone else
|
|||||||||||||