| |||||||||||||
gstreamer decodersgstreamer decodersPosted Jan 31, 2010 23:25 UTC (Sun) by DonDiego (subscriber, #24141)In reply to: gstreamer decoders by nix Parent article: Blizzard: HTML5 video and H.264 - what history tells us and why we're standing with the web
Quit worrying about FFmpeg keeping a low profile. We're not a secret to any of the players in the industry and not to the MPEG LA.
(Log in to post comments)
gstreamer decoders Posted Feb 1, 2010 0:52 UTC (Mon) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]
Oh I'm not worrying. I entirely believe you: ffmpeg is too influential for
MPEG LA not to know about it. But *if* the supposition (bandied about by several here including IIRC Trelane) were true that ffmpeg had been ignored because it was too ignorable or not a revenue generator or something, then Trelane had just poked a dragon (or at least a troll) with a stick. This is generally considered a bad idea, even if it turns out that the dragon knows who you are and doesn't want to eat you today.
gstreamer decoders Posted Feb 1, 2010 19:45 UTC (Mon) by rawler (guest, #60308) [Link]
Personally, my guess would be that ffmpeg may be too influential. Banning
ffmpeg for patent-reasons would be pretty much poking not the bear, but the bee-hive of pissed of techno-geeks everywhere.
As the mail states, there are intentional exceptions for low-volume (in
|
|||||||||||||