| |||||||||||||
FFmpeg vs. MPEG-LA royaltiesFFmpeg vs. MPEG-LA royaltiesPosted Jan 31, 2010 11:46 UTC (Sun) by DonDiego (subscriber, #24141)In reply to: FFmpeg vs. MPEG-LA royalties by roc Parent article: Blizzard: HTML5 video and H.264 - what history tells us and why we're standing with the web
I'll have to note here that Google likely had an MPEG LA license anyway, same as all the other big players. Since they calculate with the cost of that license to operate, browser or not, no extra costs are incurred if they ship H.264 support. That's one of the reasons why MPEG LA patent licenses do not make them break a sweat.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||