| |||||||||||||
Blizzard: HTML5 video and H.264 - what history tells us and why we're standing with the webBlizzard: HTML5 video and H.264 - what history tells us and why we're standing with the webPosted Jan 26, 2010 21:52 UTC (Tue) by MisterIO (guest, #36192)Parent article: Blizzard: HTML5 video and H.264 - what history tells us and why we're standing with the web
The solution is very simple: make a better video codec! If you can, that is.
(Log in to post comments)
Blizzard: HTML5 video and H.264 - what history tells us and why we're standing with the web Posted Jan 26, 2010 22:15 UTC (Tue) by Trelane (subscriber, #56877) [Link]
Dirac is underway. Doesn't mean that the MPEG-LA cabal won't shoot you down anyway, since they stand to lose their profits and ability to bully others.
Blizzard: HTML5 video and H.264 - what history tells us and why we're standing with the web Posted Jan 27, 2010 0:05 UTC (Wed) by coriordan (guest, #7544) [Link]
When I looked into it a few years ago, I heard that Dirac wasn't a viable replacment for mpeg/h264/ogg and never will be because that's not it's goal. It was designed to make high-quality copies of videos for archiving. This was the reason the BBC's own (DRM'd) online movie player doesn't use Dirac.
(Maybe things have changed. I think it was 2008 when I read that.)
Dirac Posted Jan 30, 2010 16:06 UTC (Sat) by DonDiego (subscriber, #24141) [Link]
Dirac development appears stalled. There are no new releases and activity on their CVS repositories has stopped.
Dirac Posted Jan 30, 2010 16:19 UTC (Sat) by DonDiego (subscriber, #24141) [Link]
After a bit more investigation it appears that libschroedinger has switched to git and there is some activity on the git repository. Whether libdirac also switched, I don't know.
is completely useless and provides little information unfortunately...
|
|||||||||||||