Ogg vs. Theora [LWN.net]

Ogg vs. Theora

Posted Jan 26, 2010 10:23 UTC (Tue) by DonDiego (subscriber, #24141)
In reply to: Blizzard: HTML5 video and H.264 - what history tells us and why we're standing with the web by paulj
Parent article: Blizzard: HTML5 video and H.264 - what history tells us and why we're standing with the web

> (and yes, I know Ogg Theora is a container format itself, I don't
> know the name of the free video codec it uses - VP3?)

Ogg is the container, Theora is the codec. Theora is derived from the VP3 codec originally created by On2.

Ogg is a deeply flawed container format, for details see

http://hardwarebug.org/2008/11/17/ogg-timestamps-explored/

(Log in to post comments)

Ogg vs. Theora

Posted Jan 26, 2010 13:02 UTC (Tue) by __alex (subscriber, #38036) [Link]

Avi and Vorbis audio do not work very well together. I'm not sure if there are
even any DirectShow filters other than ffmpeg that support it and even that
has trouble keeping the audio in sync.

Ogg vs. Theora

Posted Jan 26, 2010 21:38 UTC (Tue) by Trelane (subscriber, #56877) [Link]

http://xiph.org/downloads/

Xiph has them. Dunno if they're perhaps ffmpeg-based, but it seems unlikely.

Ogg vs. Theora

Posted Jan 27, 2010 11:40 UTC (Wed) by DonDiego (subscriber, #24141) [Link]

They are not based on FFmpeg.

Ogg vs. Theora

Posted Feb 1, 2010 14:45 UTC (Mon) by nye (guest, #51576) [Link]

Matroska is probably the way forward.

Ogg vs. Theora

Posted Feb 4, 2010 1:13 UTC (Thu) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]

Does it just show that I don't watch much video, or that I don't watch
much (any) pirated video, that I've never actually seen anything in a
Matroska container? (At least, not knowingly. I've never encountered an
odd-looking video file and run file(1) or similar tool on it and been
told, hey, this is Matroska.)

Ogg vs. Theora

Posted Feb 4, 2010 23:30 UTC (Thu) by DonDiego (subscriber, #24141) [Link]

The answer is yes ;-)