how implementable Flash is [LWN.net]

how implementable Flash is

Posted Jan 26, 2010 2:20 UTC (Tue) by butlerm (subscriber, #13312)
In reply to: how implementable Flash is by coriordan
Parent article: Blizzard: HTML5 video and H.264 - what history tells us and why we're standing with the web

Something about "if you use this software, you agree not to use the gained knowledge for the purpose of writing a competing program"
It it is somewhat questionable whether a term like that in a retail end user license agreement would in fact be enforceable, especially if the user of the software was not the person who installed it. Courts in the United States have decided both ways. If the EFF wanted to do something useful, they would find people with standing to challenge the extremely dubious arguments behind retail shrinkwrap licenses and push the counterargument based on traditional legal reasoning and copyright law until the disingenuousness of the idea that consumers do not own "copies" of software they buy of the shelf (and the consequent nullity of most end user SLAs) is obvious to every judge in the country.

(Log in to post comments)

how implementable Flash is

Posted Jan 26, 2010 13:31 UTC (Tue) by dannyobrien (subscriber, #25583) [Link]

If the EFF wanted to do something useful, they would find people with standing to challenge the extremely dubious arguments behind retail shrinkwrap licenses and push the counterargument based on traditional legal reasoning

It's funny you should say that... actually EFF is heavily involved in this fight (it was counsel on two of the three cases listed on the page you linked to), and I do believe we're expecting to work on a number of key cases in this area in the next year. We generally describe this as the fight over first sale (partly because the fight also includes patent issues as well as shrinkwrap licenses), but it's the same counterargument.