| |||||||||||||
London Stock Exchange begins migration to Linux-based trading platform (ComputerworldUK)London Stock Exchange begins migration to Linux-based trading platform (ComputerworldUK)Posted Jan 22, 2010 18:32 UTC (Fri) by leoc (subscriber, #39773)In reply to: London Stock Exchange begins migration to Linux-based trading platform (ComputerworldUK) by epa Parent article: London Stock Exchange begins migration to Linux-based trading platform (ComputerworldUK) I don't see how us not knowing who did the "real" work benefits them in any way. Even if their only involvement was to spend 5 minutes writing a press release taking credit for the work, it is still their fault when it fails, just as it would be to their credit had it succeeded. Considering the LSE CIO touted his personal relationship with Steve Ballmer while he was dissing Linux, I would be absolutely astonished if Ballmer didn't send every member of the core .NET and Windows develop teams to the LSE when the shit hit the fan.
(Log in to post comments)
London Stock Exchange begins migration to Linux-based trading platform (ComputerworldUK) Posted Jan 24, 2010 22:26 UTC (Sun) by alextingle (guest, #20593) [Link]
Wow, that article is from 2003 and already it sounds like another world.
One 2003-era CIO said "[our supplier forced us to switch to Linux and] we found we had an additional overhead in understanding the technology and the total cost of ownership has risen." He was obviously influenced by those old "total cost of ownership" ads from Microsoft. You don't hear MS banging on about TCO these days do you?
|
|||||||||||||