|| ||"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-AT-zytor.com> |
|| ||Yuhong Bao <yuhongbao_386-AT-hotmail.com> |
|| ||Re: Ubuntu 32-bit, 32-bit PAE, 64-bit Kernel Benchmarks |
|| ||Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:53:42 -0800|
|| ||Linus Torvalds <torvalds-AT-linux-foundation.org>, mingo-AT-redhat.com,
|| ||Article, Thread
On 01/15/2010 06:06 PM, Yuhong Bao wrote:
>> The big difference isn't between HIGHMEM4G (no PAE) and HIGHMEM64G
>> (PAE), it's between HIGHMEM and !HIGHMEM. That cutoff is ~892 MB for a
>> stock 32-bit kernel.
> Unfortunately most desktop/laptop systems nowadays ship with more than 1GB.Luckily, in the case
of Atom netbooks that Linus mentioned, most Atom netbooks ship with only 1GB of RAM, partly due to
MS's restrictions.However, disabling HIGHMEM will turn off NX which all Atom CPUs have, unless you
turn CONFIG_PAE back on.
Since 32 bits means that any machine with 1 GB more means HIGHMEM, the
number of non-embedded machines that should run 32-bit kernels today is
functionally the null set. Unfortunately Linux distros have not
properly promoted 64-bit kernels for 32-bit distros; although pure 64
bits is better, it would be a *helluva* lot better if people stuck on 32
bits for compatibility reasons had a saner alternative.
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
to post comments)