What SCO Wants, SCO Gets (Forbes)
Posted Jun 19, 2003 6:48 UTC (Thu) by ronaldcole
In reply to: What SCO Wants, SCO Gets (Forbes)
Parent article: What SCO Wants, SCO Gets (Forbes)
He implied that if the Supreme Court hadn't appointed the President, then the popular vote would have produced the opposite result. He's wrong on both counts. Not only didn't the Supreme Court "appoint" the President, but how can he know that the democratic slate of Electors wouldn't have been so appalled at the actions of their party that enough electoral votes would have been cast for Bush to achieve the same result?
Simple answer: he can't.
to post comments)