| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
The result isn't quite what he thinks it isThe result isn't quite what he thinks it isPosted Dec 22, 2009 11:04 UTC (Tue) by michaeljt (subscriber, #39183)In reply to: The result isn't quite what he thinks it is by BrucePerens Parent article: Meeks: Some thoughts on copyright assignment
>Of the two companies we can prove made a profit with Open Source, one didn't use community
> development. Could this mean that community development isn't even a good idea if you're out > to make money? Too strong a development community might actually be a threat to some open source business models.
(Log in to post comments)
Threats and efficiencies Posted Dec 22, 2009 11:09 UTC (Tue) by sladen (subscriber, #27402) [Link] "Threat" has negative connotations; what's actually happening is the optimisation and evolution of a development process—in the long run it is better for the general good.
|
|
||||||||||||