| |||||||||||||
Why is always busybox?Why is always busybox?Posted Dec 14, 2009 20:13 UTC (Mon) by BrucePerens (guest, #2510)In reply to: Why is always busybox? by rahvin Parent article: Best Buy, Samsung, And Westinghouse Named In SFLC Suit Today
Nobody ever violates the license on busybox for a smart reason. Proprietary code would not be connected with it. It's just a lack of due diligence combined with a failure to respond when contacted. I could confuse things tremendously by taking my original code-base and applying the BSD license to it. :-) Bruce
(Log in to post comments)
Why is always busybox? Posted Dec 14, 2009 20:33 UTC (Mon) by atai (subscriber, #10977) [Link]
No, you want to apply the GPLv3 to it. That is better!
Why is always busybox? Posted Dec 14, 2009 20:42 UTC (Mon) by BrucePerens (guest, #2510) [Link]
I could dual-license it.
Why is always busybox? Posted Dec 15, 2009 22:00 UTC (Tue) by davi (guest, #18853) [Link]
You could, but I hope you do not do it.
User freedom:
|
|||||||||||||