| |||||||||||||
Poulsbo mess casts a shadow on Intel's Moblin project (ars technica)Poulsbo mess casts a shadow on Intel's Moblin project (ars technica)Posted Dec 13, 2009 19:46 UTC (Sun) by drag (subscriber, #31333)In reply to: Poulsbo mess casts a shadow on Intel's Moblin project (ars technica) by fergal Parent article: Poulsbo mess casts a shadow on Intel's Moblin project (ars technica)
Via likes to lie. They have been stoking the 'linux ready' and 'open source
graphics' pipe for a long time now and it has never really turned out to have any sort of basis in reality.
Intel is still the best bet and ATI is quickly gaining ground if your
ATI should be interesting, though. Their IGP is much faster then Intel's
(Log in to post comments)
Poulsbo mess casts a shadow on Intel's Moblin project (ars technica) Posted Dec 13, 2009 20:46 UTC (Sun) by fergal (subscriber, #602) [Link] Fair enough but Intel don't have a low-power chipset with Linux support and the features I listed, unless I've missed something in my searching.
Poulsbo mess casts a shadow on Intel's Moblin project (ars technica) Posted Dec 14, 2009 2:14 UTC (Mon) by hmh (subscriber, #3838) [Link]
Depends on what you call low-power. The 945GME is low power, if you compare it with traditional mobile chipsets. It doesn't come close to Poulsbo's efficiency, but it does have a (when compared to Poulsbo) kick-ass IGP.
And, unlike Poulsbo, it is not a smelly diasper for non-Windows usage.
Poulsbo mess casts a shadow on Intel's Moblin project (ars technica) Posted Dec 14, 2009 2:56 UTC (Mon) by fergal (subscriber, #602) [Link] Only 2-port SATA and no mention of 1080p or accelerated codecs, MP4 etc. So its power consumption appears somewhat moot.
|
|||||||||||||