| |||||||||||||
Still no Canonical?Still no Canonical?Posted Dec 9, 2009 14:18 UTC (Wed) by Cato (subscriber, #7643)In reply to: Still no Canonical? by gregkh Parent article: Who wrote 2.6.32
Ignoring Canonical's major contributions in usability and integration above the kernel is also pretty "sad", not to say biased. If you weren't working for a competitor, your harping on about this would be more credible - I prefer Red Hat's approach in just developing great new features in Fedora.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||