| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Callaway: Chromium: Why it isn't in Fedora yet as a proper packageCallaway: Chromium: Why it isn't in Fedora yet as a proper packagePosted Dec 1, 2009 23:59 UTC (Tue) by sharms (subscriber, #57357)Parent article: Callaway: Chromium: Why it isn't in Fedora yet as a proper package
It's amazing how many people have negative opinions on what other people
are doing, yet are doing so little / nothing themselves.
Creators have little time to bicker.
(Log in to post comments)
Callaway: Chromium: Why it isn't in Fedora yet as a proper package Posted Dec 2, 2009 0:31 UTC (Wed) by motk (subscriber, #51120) [Link]
Are you seriously saying that spot is not a 'creator'? Seriously?
Callaway: Chromium: Why it isn't in Fedora yet as a proper package Posted Dec 2, 2009 5:20 UTC (Wed) by mattdm (subscriber, #18) [Link]
Yeah, that's by far one of the silliest comments I've seen on LWN.
Callaway: Chromium: Why it isn't in Fedora yet as a proper package Posted Dec 2, 2009 1:08 UTC (Wed) by sbergman27 (guest, #10767) [Link]
He'll come around once he sees that the distro he represents will be left behind if he doesn't.
Or someone else will step in if he proves to be too stubborn.
Callaway: Chromium: Why it isn't in Fedora yet as a proper package Posted Dec 2, 2009 2:04 UTC (Wed) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]
Considering that no distribution seems to be including Chromium for the same set of problems, you are just engaged in wishful thinking. Upstream is well aware of these problems and tracking these issues.
|
|
||||||||||||