| |||||||||||
typos, I guess...typos, I guess...Posted Jun 16, 2003 20:17 UTC (Mon) by roelofs (subscriber, #2599)Parent article: SCO's quarterly report "maneuvering" (optionally with an "oe" digraph, IIRC) also: "in the bank"? "reason to wish"? (I can't parse the final paragraph as written.) Greg
(Log in to post comments)
typos, I guess... Posted Jun 17, 2003 2:15 UTC (Tue) by busterb (subscriber, #560) [Link] I think that they meant that:Recent investors in SCO may soon regret their decisions to invest, because SCO's stock price may drop soon due to a dim prospects for solid, sustainable revenue.
typos, I guess... Posted Jun 17, 2003 10:50 UTC (Tue) by ayeomans (subscriber, #1848) [Link] Dead cat bounce ? Reuters SCOx 5-year price
typos, I guess... Posted Jun 19, 2003 20:02 UTC (Thu) by roelofs (subscriber, #2599) [Link] I think that they meant that: Recent investors in SCO may soon regret their decisions to invest, because SCO's stock price may drop soon due to a dim prospects for solid, sustainable revenue.Right, that's fairly clear now. But the original text was:
SCO claims to have $10 million in the back . . . Participants in the recent rally in SCO's stock price may yet find a reason to which they had missed out. These silent editorial fixes leave the original comment looking strange and/or idiotic. ;-)
typos, I guess... Posted Jun 19, 2003 21:08 UTC (Thu) by ris (editor, #5) [Link] Sorry. There were typos and I did silently fix them.ris
|
|||||||||||